The jury in the Lindsay Clancy case has indicated they may be in deadlock. If that continues, what’s next? What happens if there’s a mistrial? We discuss.

We review the closings in the Lindsay Clancy case.

The presentation of evidence comes to a close, closings loom, and we give you our opinion on what happened and what the verdict should be.

The trial nears its end with powerful testimony from Dr. Kirk Heilbrun and BAU senior psychiatrist Dr. Gregory Saathoff.

Attorney Reddington and Dr. Mack go at it–to no one’s obvious benefit–and Dr. Kirk Heilbrun takes the stand. And we have some drama. The defense asks for a mistrial. Will they get it?

The defense rests, and the Commonwealth begins its rebuttal with Dr. Avrim Mack.

The battle of the experts heats up in the Lindsay Clancy case.

The Commonwealth finds that old-time religion, and the defense begins its expert witness presentation.

The prosecution rests, and the defense begins its case in the Lindsay Clancy trial.

Days 12 and 13 of the Lindsay Clancy trial brought drama, controversy, and seeming efforts by both sides to help the other. Lindsay broke down while autopsy reports were discussed, her attorney suggested the prosecutors believe her story about a commanding voice is not only a lie but coached by her own expert, and both sides introduced searches which seemed more like own goals than gotchas. All that, and is the Commonwealth preparing to rest? We discuss.